Citizen Journalism...I'm Excited!
I have not been so excited about journalism since...well, I never have I don't think. So I'll rephrase that sentence to make sense- I have never been so excited about journalism as I am now!
I know that 9/11 allowed citizens of America to share their stories about the Twin Tower attacks, and videos of the London bombings were taken on a video phone, but the recent events in Mumbai seem to have opened up a massive door in terms of citizen journalism.
I was reading the live update feed about the Mumbai attacks on the BBC website. As the major events began to draw to a close (thank goodness), there were Twitter updates being used by the BBC to illustrate what was going on in real time. People in the city were updating their Twitter statuses to let the world know what was really happening, and the BBC used it as news. Which, I feel, is perfectly right.
The journalism may not be relying on sending reporters out to India, but it is still doing it's job; reporting NEW events.
Not only was Twitter used in the reporting, Flickr, Global Voices and personal blogs made contributions to news stories. Surely I cannot be the only one who is finding this quite amazing, and quite exciting, without meaning to be so insensitive to a terrorist attack.
I was up until about 5am yesterday, just updating BBC updates, Twitter and Flickr to get a real life view of what is happening in Mumbai. This is the only way to do it, I can't fly out there to see it for myself, so citizens are my best option.
Here is a link to a story about citizen journalism in the New York Times...that I found on Twitter!! http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/world/asia/30twitter.html?_r=1&partner=rss
What do you think? Excited or cheated of real journalism?
I know that 9/11 allowed citizens of America to share their stories about the Twin Tower attacks, and videos of the London bombings were taken on a video phone, but the recent events in Mumbai seem to have opened up a massive door in terms of citizen journalism.
I was reading the live update feed about the Mumbai attacks on the BBC website. As the major events began to draw to a close (thank goodness), there were Twitter updates being used by the BBC to illustrate what was going on in real time. People in the city were updating their Twitter statuses to let the world know what was really happening, and the BBC used it as news. Which, I feel, is perfectly right.
The journalism may not be relying on sending reporters out to India, but it is still doing it's job; reporting NEW events.
Not only was Twitter used in the reporting, Flickr, Global Voices and personal blogs made contributions to news stories. Surely I cannot be the only one who is finding this quite amazing, and quite exciting, without meaning to be so insensitive to a terrorist attack.
I was up until about 5am yesterday, just updating BBC updates, Twitter and Flickr to get a real life view of what is happening in Mumbai. This is the only way to do it, I can't fly out there to see it for myself, so citizens are my best option.
Here is a link to a story about citizen journalism in the New York Times...that I found on Twitter!! http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/world/asia/30twitter.html?_r=1&partner=rss
What do you think? Excited or cheated of real journalism?
Labels: chester, citizen journalism, india, lucy, mumbai, new york times, terror, terrorism, woolford, world news
